بررسی موانع پداگوژیک در توسعه‌ی آموزش الکترونیکی: مطالعه‌ی موردی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی‌شاپور اهواز

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد برنامه ریزی آموزشی، مسؤول آموزش پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز

2 عضو هیأت علمی، گروه برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی دزفول.

3 عضو هیأت علمی، گروه برنامهریزی آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی دزفول

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به بررسی موانع پداگوژیک (انعطاف‌پذیری، ابزارهای برقراری ارتباط، یادگیرنده محوری، مدیریت برنامه‌ها و منابع و ارزیابی) در توسعه‌ی آموزش الکترونیکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی‌جندی‌شاپور اهواز در سال 1390-1389 می‌پردازد. این تحقیق از نوع توصیفی- مقطعی می‌باشد و جامعه‌ی آماری شامل تمامی اعضای هیأت علمی این دانشگاه می باشد. پرسشنامه‌ی محقق‌ساخته که پایایی آن 96درصد است، با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرانباخ محاسبه شده است، و روایی آن توسط متخصصان تأیید گردید. جهت محاسبه‌ی نتایج از آزمون کای اسکوور استفاده شده است و همچنین برای رتبه‌بندی موانع از تست فریدمن استفاده شده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که همه‌‌ی عوامل به ترتیب‌ شامل: ارزیابی، یادگیرنده محوری، ابزارهای برقراری ارتباط، انعطاف‌پذیری و مدیریت‌برنامه‌ها و منابع از موانع توسعه‌ی آموزش الکترونیک در دانشگاه علوم‌پزشکی‌جندی‌شاپور اهواز هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Pedagogic Barriers to the Development of Electronic Education: A Case Study of Ahvaz Jundi Shapour University of Medical Sciences

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdolhosein Ogbeh 1
  • Abdolmehdi Moarrefzadeh 2
  • Saeid Moshtaghi 3
1 MA of educational planning
2 Faculty member of Islamic Azad University of Dezfool, Dezfoo, Iran
3 Faculty member of Islamic Azad University of Dezfool, Dezfoo, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this study an attempt has been made to investigate the pedagogic barriers to the development of electronic education (via the Internet) at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS) during 2010-2011. This is descriptive-sectional study whose population involved the whole faculty members of AJUMS. The researchers prepared a questionnaire with a reliability of 96 % which was obtained through Cronbach's α, and its validity was confirmed by specialists in this field. As for the calculation of the results and ranking the barriers, Chi square test and Friedman test were euseded respectively. The findings of this research suggested that all the studied items (evaluation, learner-based, communication tools, flexibility, and the management of programs and resources) are among the barriers to the development of electronic education at AJUMS.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pedagogic
  • Electronic education
  • Virtual Education
  • remote education

Asemi, A 2006, Metadata in electronic education environment, Sciences and techniques publications, Tehran. (Persian)
Dargahi, H; Ghazi Saeedi, M; Ghasemi, M 2007, 2007, the stage of electronic education in medical science universities, Journal of faculty of Allied Medical Science of Tehran Univesity (Payavard e Salamat), Vol.1, No.2, pp.20-29. (Persian)
Dreyfus, H 2011, How far is distance learning from education?, Bulletin of Technology Society, Vol.21, p:165-74.
Emami, H; Aghdasi, M; Asoosheh, A 2009, Electronic learning in medical education, Journal of research in medicine of Shahid Beheshti University, Vol.33, No.2, pp.102-111. (Persian)
Gulati, A 2008, Technology – enhanced learning in developing nations: A review, International Review of Research in open and Distance Learning, Vol. 9, No.1, p.1-16.
Hergenhahn, BR; Olson MH, 2004, An introduction to theories of learning, 6th ed, Translated by: Saif AA, Dowran publicationISBN, P. 525. (Persian)
Hosseini Largani, M; Mirarab razi, R; Rezaei, S 2008, Investigation of obstacles against electronic education in Iranian educational system, dual quarterly journal of management and planning in educational systems, Vol.1, No.7, pp.59. (Persian)
Khan, BH, 2004, People, process and product continuum in e-learning: The e-learning P3 model, Educ Technol, Vol.44, No. 2, pp.33-40.
Lian Song, ES; Janette, R; Singleton, G; et al 2004, Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics, Internet and Higher Education, Vol.7, pp.59-70.
Maghami, H 2011, An investigation of obstacles against utilizing educational technology in academic teaching from the viewpoint of faculty members of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Research in educational systems, Vol.45, No.5. (Persian)
Momeni Raad, A; Ali Abadi, KH 2010, Guaranty of quality in electronic education with utilizing electronic educational standards, quarterly journal of education strategies, Vol. 3, No.3, pp. 87-92. (Persian)
Moniee, R 2004, Developing of Distance Education in Higher Education: Challenge & Opportunism, Rahyaft Research Article, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp.43. (Persian).
Moosavi, M; Mohammadzadeh Nasrabadi, M; ezashkirad, Gh 2011, Identifying and analyzing deterrent obstacles of use and development of electronic learning in Payam e Noor University, quarterly journal of research and planning in high education, Vol.59, pp.137-154. (Persian)
Nagy, A 2004, E-Learning; Published in a Series of E-Content Reports by ACTeN June 2004, Available from: www.acten.net.
Naidu, S 2006, E-Learning: A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices, Published on Behalf of the Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia, India: New Delhi.
Ruiz, GJ; Mintzer, MJ; Leipzig, RM 2006, The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education, Acad Med, Vol.81, pp. 207.
Taylor, JH 2003, Facilitating distance learning in nurse education, Nurse education in practice, Vol.3, No.3, pp.23-29.
Vonderwell, S 2003, An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study, Internet and higher education, Vol.43, No.6, pp. 77-90.
Yucel, AS 2006, E-learning approach in teacher training, Turkish Online J Dist Educ (TOJDE), Vol.7, No.4, pp.123-31.