korpi, M., nazem, F., karimzadeh, S. (2019). Provide a native model of knowledge commercialization in the field of health University of Medical Sciences in Tehran. Educational Development of Judishapur, 9(4), 296-310.
masoumeh korpi; fatah nazem; samad karimzadeh. "Provide a native model of knowledge commercialization in the field of health University of Medical Sciences in Tehran". Educational Development of Judishapur, 9, 4, 2019, 296-310.
korpi, M., nazem, F., karimzadeh, S. (2019). 'Provide a native model of knowledge commercialization in the field of health University of Medical Sciences in Tehran', Educational Development of Judishapur, 9(4), pp. 296-310.
korpi, M., nazem, F., karimzadeh, S. Provide a native model of knowledge commercialization in the field of health University of Medical Sciences in Tehran. Educational Development of Judishapur, 2019; 9(4): 296-310.
Provide a native model of knowledge commercialization in the field of health University of Medical Sciences in Tehran
1Ph.D. Department of Education, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Iran.
2Faculty member, Department of Education, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Abstract
The main objective of this research is "Provide a native model of knowledge commercialization in the field of health at the University of Medical Sciences in Tehran". The statistical population of the research includes academic experts and experts consisting of managers, experts, custodians and consultants in the field of knowledge commercialization in the field of health of medical universities of Tehran in which the information gathering has been continued until saturation, as well as for sample size selection In this paper, based on the opinions of 18 experts and the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin in three stages of open, axial and selective coding, 72 concepts and 15 categories have been extracted. Among them, the commercialization of knowledge in the field of health as the central category and the other 14 components of the data theory theory data base Formed. The proposed comprehensive model proposed in the second stage was tested and analyzed using SPSS 20, Lisrel8.8 and SmartPLS.03 software and the results of the findings indicate that all the variables considered in the form of the abovementioned levels as variables Which should be considered in the design of the optimal model, has been approved. Also, given that the absolute value of the t-value for all relationships between the variables was larger than the critical value of 1.96 and all factor loads in a standard state greater than 0.3, then none of the relationships was rejected and all the validation variables and relationships Became So, the original model of the research was finally confirmed.
ارائه الگوی بومی تجاری سازی دانش در حوزه سلامت در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی در شهر تهران
Authors [Persian]
معصومه کرپی1; فتاح ناظم2; صمد کریم زاده2
1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران.
2عضو هیأت علمی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران.
Abstract [Persian]
هدف اصلی این پژوهش « ارائه الگوی بومی تجاری سازی دانش در حوزه سلامت در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی در شهر تهران» است. جامعه آماری تحقیق حاضر شامل خبرگان دانشگاهی و متخصصین که مشتمل بر مدیران، کارشناسان، متولیان و مشاورین حوزه تجاری سازی دانش در حوزه سلامت دانشگاه های علوم پزشکی در شهر تهران می باشند که گردآوری اطلاعات تا زمان اشباع ادامه یافته است؛ همچنین برای انتخاب حجم نمونه از روش گلوله‌برفی استفاده شده است که بر اساس نظرات 18 نفر خبره و رویکرد سیستمی استراوس و کوربین در طی سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی، 72 مفهوم و 15 مقوله استخراج گردیده که از بین آنها مقوله تجاری سازی دانش در حوزه سلامت به عنوان مقوله مرکزی و 14 مورد دیگر اجزای نظریه داده بنیاد پژوهش را تشکیل دادند. مدل جامع پیشنهادی ارائه شده در مرحله دوم با استفاده از نرم افزارهای آماریSPSS 20 ،Lisrel8.8 و SmartPLS.03 مورد آزمون و تحلیل قرار گرفته و نتایج یافته ها حاکی از این است که تمامی متغیرهای احصا شده در قالب سطوح مذکور، به عنوان متغیرهایی که باید در طراحی مدل مطلوب مورد توجه قرار گیرند، مورد تایید قرار گرفت. همچنین با توجه به اینکه قدر مطلق مقدار آماره t برای تمامی روابط بین متغیرها بزرگ تر از مقدار بحرانی 1.96 و نیز تمامی بارهای عاملی در حالت استاندارد بزرگ تر از 0.3 به دست آمد، لذا هیچ کدام از روابط رد نشده و تمامی متغیرها و روابط تایید شد. بنابراین درنهایت مدل اولیه تحقیق نیز تایید گردید.
Keywords [Persian]
تجاری سازی، تجاری سازی دانش سلامت، طراحی الگو، نظریه پردازی داده بنیاد
References
Abbas, A, Avdic, A et al 2017, University-government collaboration for the generation andcommercialization of new knowledge for use in industry, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, JIK-76, p.9.
Abbasi Esfanjani H, Foruzandeh Dehkordi, L 2015, Designing a Comprehensive Model for Commercialization of Academic Research with the Delphi Approach, Quarterly Journal of Business Research, No.75.
Astebro, Th 2004, Key Success Factors for Technological Entrepreneurs' R&D Projects, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.51, No.314-321.
Bandarian, R 2007, Evaluation of Commercial Potential of a New Technology At The Early Stage of Developement With Fuzzy Logic, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, Vol. 2, No.4, Pp.73-85.
Behboudi, M, Jalili, N et al 2011, Examine the commercialization research outcomes in Iran: a structural equation model, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.6, No.7, Pp.261-284.
Bercovitz, J, Feldman, M 2006, Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.31, No.1, Pp.175-188.
Bikfalvi, A, Tarrés, C. S et al 2007, Technological trampolines for new venture creation in Catalonia: the case of the University of Girona. Documents de Treball (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament d'Economia de l'Empresa, vol.1, pp.105-128.
Biranvand, A, Shabani, A et al 2017, The evolution of the commercialization of Knowledge with New Approach of Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy (RPYS), University of Nebraska – Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
Boehm N.D, Hogan, T 2012, Science-to-Business collaborations: A science-to-business marketing perspective on scientific knowledge commercialization, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.42, Pp.564–579.
Choi, H, J 2009, Technology transfer issues and a new technology transfer model, Journal of Technology Studies, Vol.35, No.1, Pp.49–57.
Cummings, J.L, Teng, B 2003, Transfering R &Knowledge: The Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Succes, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol.20, Pp.39-68.
Debackere, Veugelers, R 2005, The role of academic technology transfers organizations in improving industry science links, Research Policy, Vol.34, Pp: 321–342.
Esfanjani, A 1396, Investigating the Design of the Commercialization Pattern of Academic Research by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM-PLS), Vol.21, No.82, Pp.1-21.
Fenger, Morten, H, Frederiksen, L et al 2016, Entrepreneurial intent and commercialization of applications on a technology platform, Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich.
Fong, P.S 2003, Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: Anempirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.21, No.7, Pp.479–486.
Forouzandeh Dehkordi, L, Jovkar, A et al 2014, The Conceptual Framework for Commercialization of Research Findings in Iranian Universities, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, Vol.3, No.5, Pp.26-32.
Fulghieri, P, Sevilir, M 2011, Mergers, spin-offs, and employee incentives, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.24, No.7, Pp.2207-224.
Galateia, Marianthi, N 2013, Democratization and Commercialization of Knowledge: The World Digital Library and its Assessment, Recibido: 3 de febrero del 2013 Aprobado: 1 de abril del 2013.
Goudarzi, M, Bamdadsoufi, J et al 2012, Process model for technology commercialization of public Iranian's research institutions, Journal of science & technology policy, Vol.2, Pp.41-56.
Hsu, D.W, Shen, Y.-C et al 2015, Toward successfulcommercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of universitytechnology transfer in Taiwan, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.92, Pp.25–39.
Inkpen, A. C 1996, Creating knowledge through collaboration, California Management Review, Vol.39, No.1, Pp.123–140.
Jahandideh, M, Akhavanfard, M 2006, Research results commercialization, the third international Iranian management conferences, Tehran, access at: http://www.civilica.com/Paper-IRIMC03-IRIMC03_181.html
Jahed, H 2012, Identify and explain the factors affecting the commercialization of research results, phd thesis, Islamic Azad university/science & research/Tehran.
Nadir Khanloo, S 2008, Developing a Model for the Transition of Knowledge and Entrepreneurship Knowledge Five Valuable Universities of the World Based on Comparison of the Academic Method, Thesis Faculty of Management, University of Tehran.
Nassiri-Koopaei, N, Majdzadeh, R et al 2014, Commercialization of biopharmaceutical knowledge in Iran; challenges and solutions, DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014, Pp.22-29
Nonaka, I 1994, A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, Vol.5, No.1, Pp.14–37.
Perkmann, M, Tartari, V et al 2013, Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations, Research Policy, Vol.42, No.2, Pp.423-442.
Rohrbeck, R, Arnold, H 2006, Making University-Industry Collaboration Work: A Case Study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, ISPIM Conference, Athens, Greece, Pp.1-18.
Rosa, J, Rose, A 2007, Report on Interviews on the Commercialisation of Innovation. Ottawa, Science, innovation and Electronic Information Division, Statistics Canada: Catalogue no.88F0006XIE-No004.
Sábato, J, Mackenzi, M 1982, La Producción de Technología. Autónoma oTransnacional, Mexico: Nueva Imagen.
Salter, A.J, Martin, B.R 2001, The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review, Research Policy, Vol.30, Pp.509–532.
Shin, T, Lemy, E 2006, Paths of commercial knowledge: Forms and consequences of university–enterprise synergy in scientist-sponsored firms, Research Policy, Vol.35, Pp.1465–1476.
Umam, K, Hewanto, W et al 2008, Higher Education Institution and Technology Transfer. Proceedings of the 5th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange. Melbourne, Australia, February, 2008.
Wu, Y, Welch, E et al 2015, Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents, Technovation, vol.36, pp.12-25.
Top