عنوان مقاله [English]
To achieve the objectives of any educational system, different methods are used. The conventional method of evaluation is mid-term exams and quizzes. Another method of evaluation is formative assessment by taking pre/posttests at the beginning and the end of each learning session. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of pre/posttest evaluations on pharmacotherapy learning among pharmacy students and studying its side effects (stress, altered concentration, so on) on students. We also compared the results with the conventional methods of evaluation. For this purpose, all pharmacy students taking pharmacotherapy (40 students) were enrolled in this study. We compared their grades of pharmacotherapy in two consecutive semesters. At the first semester they took pre/posttests at each session, and at the next semester they had three quizzes and a mid-term instead. We analyzed the mean of final exam grades of these semesters and asked the students’ view on this subject via a questionnaire. The mean of final scores of students in pre- and post-test semester and next semester were 13.80 ± 1.87 and 12.55 ± 2.25, respectively. The scores in the first group was significantly higher. 85.75% of students thought pre/post-tests increased their concentration in class. The results showed that pre and post-tests were a good way to assess knowledge of pharmacotherapy; moreover, in comparison to the conventional methods, it had a positive effect on learning. Therefore, it is claimed this method had a high satisfaction rate among students and neither show stress among the students nor interferes with their concentration in class.
Bazargan A 2004, Education Evaluation, Samt Publisher, Tehran.
Camp W 2002, Improving your teaching through effective questioning techniques. wwwagedvtedu/methods/que-skilhtm.
Edward S 1997, promoting student learning through questioning: A study of classroom questioning, gournal of excellence in college teaching, vol.7, no. 2, pp. 2-4.
Jafari N 2002, Method of continuous assessment of students, Chapar Farzanegan, Tehran.
Heydari Sh 1996, The effect of the implementation of the new system of formative evaluation on academic achievement in high school Fereydunkenararea, viwed http://www.irandoc.ac.ir/.
laboratory AE, Questioning and understanding to improvelearning and thinking(QUILT), viwed september 1997, http://www2.ed.gov/.
Mahmoodzadeh F, Rahmani R 2008, Need for formative evaluation in the educational system, Strategies for Medical Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 19-27.
Rashid Kh, Kord noghabi R, Yaghubi A 2012, Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the oral questions on learning mathematics classroom and students' interest in this course. Educational Psychology, no. 22, pp. 125-154.
Sepasi h 2003, The effect of formative evaluation of student achievement in mathematics third class.Daneshvar raftar. vol.10, no. 3, pp. 29-38.
Siadat A, Kaveh pour Z 2004,The effect of formative evaluation on the academic achievement of students in second year, Faslname Amuzeh, no. 24.Seyf, A 1997, Measurement and Educational Evaluation, Doran Pulisher, Tehran.
Seyf A 2011, Educational psychology, Agah Publisher, Tehran.
Volf R 1996, Education Evaluation, Academic Publishing, Tehran