عنوان مقاله [English]
Objective-Structured ClinicalExamination(OSCE)is oneof the best methods that can measure the aspects ofclinicalskills ofstudentsrigorously.Hence, the presentstudy aimed to assess students' opinions about the OSCEin order to estimate the admission process of students and also feedback to improve future assessments. This cross-sectional descriptive analytical study encompassed all students studying in the fourth academic yearatQazvin Dental faculty(n=21).The OSCE exam consists of eight stations;evaluates skills such as definitive diagnosis of microscopic slides; describes the histopathological figures,use of histopathology computer images, and introduction of case for differential diagnosis and treatment plan.During one day in per term,these test had been carried out under OSCE principles andtwo faculty members closely supervised the assessment of maxillofacial pathology of dental department. Thenstudents’ scores were collected in SPSS16 and analyzed using mean and frequency;to compare scoresof two test methods, t-test was used. (P <0/05) A 12-item questionnaire based on questionnaires used in similar studies with confirmed reliability and validity was completed at the end of each OSCEby student anonymously; they were asked to evaluate structure, content, and test performance, and write their suggestions.Then the questionnaires were reviewedand analyzed by using mean and frequency.The result showed that students were satisfied 86% withthe exam management, 74% with the time stations, and 55% with the structure and test sequences, and73% of students mentioned that they were fully aware of the nature of the test.Moreover, about 68% of students thought that test assessed a wide range of knowledge; 45% of student knew that exam was an opportunity to learn; and 66% students announced that exam stress was higher than prior tests. Accordingly, OSCE seems a good wayto assessstudents' skillsand awareness ofits strengths and weaknesses.The use of students’opinions in test planning can make this procedure moreacceptable to them.
1-Khalid, A.Bin Abdulrahman2007.Students views on student-teacher relationship: A Questionnaire-based study.J of family & Community Medicine; Vol.14, No.2, Pp.81-87.
2-Agarwal, A, Batra, B, Sood, A, et al2010. Objective structured clinicalexamination in radiology. Indian J Radiol Imaging; Vol.20, Pp.83-88.
3-Brand, HS, Schoonheim-Klein, M 2009. Is the OSCE more stressful? Examination anxiety and its consequences in different assessment methods in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ;Vol.13, Pp.147-153.
4-Duffield, KE, Spencer, JA 2002.A survey of medical students' views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Med Educ;Vol.36,Pp.879-886.
5-Edwards, H, Franke, M, McGuiness, B 1995.Using simulated patients to teach clinicalreasoning, Clinical reasoning in the healthprofessions, Pp.269-278.
6-Fowell, SL, Bligh, JG 1998. Recent developments in assessing medical students. Postgrad Med J; Vol.74, Pp.18-24. 7-Harden RM1979.How to assess clinical competence – an overview.Med Teach; Vol.1,Pp.289-296.
8-Holland K, Roxburgh M, Johnson M, et al2010. Fitness for practice in nursing andmidwifery education in Scotland, UnitedKingdom, Journal of clinical nursing,Vol.19, NO.3‐4, Pp. 461-469.
9-Iqbal, M, Khizar, B, Zaidi, Z 2009 .Revising an objective structured clinical examination in a resource-limited PakistaniMedical School. Educ Health (Abingdon),Vol.22, Pp.209.
10-Kurz, JM, Mahoney, K, Martin-Plank, L, et al 2009. Objective structured clinicalexamination and advanced practice nursingstudents, Journal of professional nursing,Vol.25, No.3, Pp.186-191.
11-Mangogue M, Brown G 1998. evelopment and implementing an OSCE in dentistry. Eur J Dent Edu;Vol.2,Pp.51-57.
12-Moattari, M, abdollahzargar, Sh, Musavinasab, M, et al 2007. Study validity and reliability OSCE in evaluating clinical skills by the fourth year students of hazratfateme Nursing and Midwifery school.journal of search in medical sciences ,shiraz ;Vol.31, No.1, Pp.55-59. In persian
13-Nicol, M, Freeth, D 1998, Assessment ofclinical skills: a new approach to an oldproblem, Nurse ducation Today, Vol.18, No.8, Pp.601-609.
14-Noohi, E, Motesaddi, M, Haghdoost, AK 2009. Clinical instructors' perspective on Objective Structured ClinicalExamination in Kerman universityof medical sciences. IJME;Vol.8,Pp.113-120. [Persian]
15-De Lisle, J 2001 Phase 2, OSCE student evaluation form. Mount Hope, Trinidad: The Centre for Medical Science Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences; 2001.
16-Imani, M, Hosseini Tabatabaie, MT 2005. Is OSCE successful in pediatrics?Journal of Medical Education Winter 2005, Vol.6, No.2, Pp.153-158
17-Sleem, W, El-Shaer, A, Elatroush, H 2012.Does Implementing for an Objective Structure Clinical Examination Make A Difference? Med. J. Cairo Univ.2012, Vol. 80, No. 2. Pp. 239-247
18-Pierre, R, Wierenga, A, Barton, M, et al 2004. Student evaluation of an OSCE in paediatrics at the University of the West Indies, Jamaica.BMC Medical Education; Vol.4,No.22, Pp.1-7.
19-Rokhafrooz, D, Sayyadi, N, Mirmoghtadae, Z 2014. Nursing Students’ Performance and Comments on Evaluation of Nursing Process by OSCE Style, Educational Developement of Jundishapur, Vol.5, No.4, Pp.337-344.In Persian
20-Saboori, A, Vahiddastjerdi, A, Mahdianfard, M. Investigating the Attitudes Dental School ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences postgraduate students in the Objective Structured Clinical Examinations exams in 2009. Journal of Dental School Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences;Vol.28, No.2, Pp.88-93.In persian