بازنمایی تفسیری تجارب دانشجویان از اخلاق حرفه‌ای تدریس مدرسان دانشگاه اخلاق حرفه ای تدریس مدرسان دانشگاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.

2 عضو هیات علمی، گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر با هدف بازنمایی تفسیری تجارب دانشجویان از اخلاق حرفه­ای تدریس مدرسان دانشگاه انجام گرفت. در این  مطالعه کیفی از روش پدیدارشناسی استفاده شد. جامعه آماری همه دانشجویان  دانشگاه فرهنگیان فارس بود که یک نمونه 26نفری به  روش نمونه­گیری  هدفمند گلوله برفی از بین آنان انتخاب شدند. فرایند نمونه­گیری تا اشباع نظری داده­ها ادامه یافت. ابزار پژوهش مصاحبه  نیمه ساختاریافته بود. کلیه مصاحبه­ها با هماهنگی قبلی در محیط دانشگاه در فضای آرام و مناسبی در فاصله زمانی مهرماه تا آذرماه  ســال  1398صورت گرفت. داده­های حاصل از مصاحبه­ها با روش تحلیل محتوا مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. برای اطمینان از اعتبار  داده­ها از روش­های مختلفی مانند بررسی مستمر داده­ها، تحلیل همزمان با گردآوری داده­ها، بازخورد به مصاحبه شوندگان، تخصیص زمان لازم و بازنگری ناظری استفاده گردید. تجربه دانشجویان پیرامون اخلاق حرفه­ای تدریس مدرسان در قالب 4  مؤلفه ویژگی­های شخصیتی، کارآمدی در ارایه محتوا، به کارگیری روش­های تدریس نوین، ارزشیابی مناسب و درست تفسیر شد. دانشجویان در همه مؤلفه های اخلاق حرفه­ای تدریس به مشکلات قابل توجهی اشاره نمودند که نیازمند برنامه­ریزی و توجه بیشتر دست اندرکاران دانشگاه می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Interpreting the Student's Experiences of Teaching Professional Ethics in University Teachers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amin Bagherikerachi 1
  • Jaber Aakbari 2
  • Amin Tamoradi 3
1 Faculty member, Department of Educational sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Faculty member, Islamic education group, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
3 M.Sc. student, Department of Educational sciences, Farhangian university, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

This study aimed at representing the interpretations of students' experiences of teaching professional ethics in university teachers. In this qualitative study, phenomenological method was used.  Hence, the statistical population was students of Fars Farhangian University, 26 people were selected by Purposive Snowball sampling. The process of selecting samples and collecting data continued until the theoretical saturation of the data. The research tool was semi-structured interview. All interviews were conducted with prior coordination in the university environment in a calm and appropriate atmosphere between October and December in 2019.Various methods were used to ensure the validity of the data, such as continuous data review, simultaneous data analysis, feedback to the interviewees, adequate time allocation and observer review. Then, students' experiences of teaching professional ethics were interpreted in four forms: Personality traits, Content presentation efficiency, Applying modern teaching methods, Proper and proper evaluation. Moreover, students pointed to significant problems in all components of teaching professional ethics that requires more attention from university authorities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Professional Ethics
  • University teachers
  • Farhangian University
Abbasi R, Taheri GH, Babashahi J  2017The Status of Academic Professors  Ethics from the Students' Perspective, The Journal of  EthicsScience and Technology Vol. 4, No. 12, Pp. 1-10.
Abedine S, Kamalzadeh H, Abedini S, Aghamolae T 2010, Perspectives of medical students regarding criteria for a good university professor, Bandar Abbas, Iran, hormozgan Medical Journal Vol. 14, No. 3, Pp. 241-5. (in Persian)
Babasafari M, Marsoughi R 2013,  Evaluation of professional ethics for professors of the university of  Shiraz in the view of Master’s Degree studentsand developmental correlates in curricular planning, Curricular Research Vol. 3, No.1, Pp. 67-86. (in Persian)
Çakmak  M 2010, An examination of concept maps created by prospective teachers on teacher roles, ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences  Vol. 2, N0.2, Pp. 2464-8. 
  Campbell E 2008, The ethics of teaching as a moral profession, Curriculum Inquiry Vol. 38, No. 4, Pp. 357- 85.
  Dargahi H, Hamouzadeh P, Sadeghifar J, etal 2011, Criteria assessment of a expect teacher for effective teaching, Payavard  Vol. 4, No. 3, Pp. 91- 8. (in Persian)
Day Kate 2009, Creating and sustaining effective learning environments, AISHE-Journal  Vol.1 ,No.1, Pp.1-13.
  Dewey j 1902, The School and Society, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  Edalatkhah H, Sadeghieh Ahari S, Azadkhani M, Karimollahi M 2020. Knowledge and Performance of  Professional Ethics among the Clinical Professors, Med Ethics J  Vol. 14, No. 45, Pp. 1-10. (in Persian)
Espeland K, Shanta L 2001, Empowering versus enabling in academia, Journal of Nursing Education  Vol. 40, No. 8, Pp. 342-46.
Farmahini Farahani M, Ziaeiyan Alipour F 2012, Faculty members teaching quality based on the Mycourse scale from the student’s viewpoint, Biomonthly Educ Strateg Med Sci Vol. 5, No. 13, Pp. 157-61.(in Persian)
Genn JM 2001, AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): curriculum , environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying  German dental school as measured by the Dundee Ready Education EnvironmentMeasure  2001,  Eur J Dent Educ Vol.16, No.2, Pp. 67-77.
Ghanbari S, Ardalan MR, Beheshtirad R, Soltanzadeh V 2014, University staff members' ethics and relationship with quality in high education, Ethics in Science and Technology Vol. 10, No.2.(in Persian)
Hamric AB 2001, Reflections on being in the middle, Nurs Outlook  Vol. 49, No. 6, Pp. 254-7.
Heydari M, Abolghasemi M, Mohammadi chaboki R 2018, Investigating Faculty Members’ Professional Ethics in View of Students, Ethics in science and Technology  Vol. 12, No. 4, Pp. 60-69.
Heydari M, Abolghasemi M, Mohammadi chaboki R 2018. Investigating Faculty Members’ Professional Ethics in View of Students, Ethics in science and Technology  Vol. 12, No. 4, Pp. 60-69.
Hogan S 2008. Being Ethical: How Process Drama Assists Pre-service Drama Teachers to Reflect on Professional Ethics. Submitted for Master of Arts, Queensland ,University of Technology Creative Industries Faculty Performance Studies.
 Holdford D, Reinders TP 2003, Development of an instrument to assess student perceptions of the quality of pharmaceutical education, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education  Vol. 67,No.4,Pp. 1-11.
Hutchinson  L 2003,Abc of Learning and Teaching,Educational Environment  Vol. 326, No.7393, Pp. 810-12.
Leithwood K, Patten S, Jantzi D 2010, Testing a conception of  how school leadership influences student learning, Educational Administration Quarterly  Vol. 46, No. 5, Pp. 671-706.
Mobashery M, Khosravi SH, Deris F, Taheri Z, Taji F, Mardanpour E 2011, Characteristics of a good teacher in terms of students of health school in shahrekord university of medical sciences, Med Educ J  Vol. 3, No.2, Pp. 1-8. (in Persian)
Mohd Said N, Rogayah J, Hafizah A 2008, Great teacher creates effective learning environment:  study through IIUM nursing students’ eyes, Medicine and Health  Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 274-9.
Motallebifard A, Navehebrahim A, Mohsen Zadeh F 2012, Recognizing professional and ethical indicators in university teaching from the perspectives of postgraduate students: a qualitative approach, Ethic Sci Thehnol  Vol. 6, No. 3, Pp. 1–9. (in Persian)
Najafi H, Maleki H, Farmahini Farahani M, Jafari Harandi R 2016,  An Assessment of Faculty Members' Professional Ethics from Students' Viewpoint in Medical School of Shahed University, Journal of  Zanjan  Medical Sciences Development  Vol. 9, No. 21, Pp. 93-102.
Narvaez D, Mrkva K  2014, Creative moral imagination, New York, Palgrave MacMillan. 
Piralaiy E, Sheikhalizadeh M 2017. A Study of Status of the Research Ethics Compliance in Academic Members of  Physical Education and Sport Sciences Faculties’ of  State Universities of  Northwest of  Iran, Bioethics Journal Vol. 7, No. 24, Pp. 55-67.
Pourkarimi J, Ghamoosh Z, Ehtesham Z, Mohseni Mehr Z 2019. A Comparative Approach to the Professional Ethics of  Scientific Board Members from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members and Students (Case Study: Tehran University), Culture in the Islamic university Vol.9, No. 31, Pp. 151-186.
Pourshafei  H, Ramezanzade KH 2018. An enquiry into the current and the desirable status of  professors’ professional ethics from the perspective of students in Birjand University of  Medical Sciences, Journal of  Birjand University of  Medical Sciences Vol. 25, Pp. 107-114. (in Persian)
Rezai B 2013, Being familiar with the rules, secrets of Umrah, Tehran, Mashar.
Riquelme  A, Oporto M 2009, Measuring students' perceptions of the educational climate of the new curriculum at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: performance of the Spanish translation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM), Educ Health (Abingdon) Vol. 22, No 1, Pp. 112. 
 Salajegheh A, Safari S 2014, Relationship between professional ethics and function of professors, Ethics in Science and Technology  Vol. 10, No. 3. (in Persian)
Shaikh ZA, Khoja SA 2012, Role of Teacher in Personal Learning Environments, Digital Education Review  Vol. 21, Pp. 23-32.
Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R 2008, What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature, Acad Med  Vol. 83, No. 5, Pp. 452-66.
Tabarsi F 2005,Religious mores of a given source, Pp. 194.
Varma R, Tiyagi  E Gupta  J K  2005. Determining the quality of educational climate across multiple undergraduate teaching sites using the DREEM inventory, BMC Med Educ  Vol.5, No.1, Pp.8-25.
Wang  J, Zang S, Shan T 2009, Dundee readyEducation environment measure: psychometric testing with Chinese nursing students, Journal of Advanced Nursing  Vol. 65, No. 12, Pp. 2701–2709.
Whittle S, Whelan B, Murdoch-Eaton DG 2007, DREEM and beyond; studies of the educationa environment as a means for its enhancement, Education for Health Vol. 20, No. 1, Pp.1-9.
Worthington RP 2015,  Ethics and professionalism in a changing world Investigación Educación Médica  Vol. 4, No. 15, Pp. 175- 178.