رضایت مندی دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی فیزیوتراپی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز از ارزشیابی عملکرد بالینی با استفاده از سیاهه وارسی مبتنی بر بازخورد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی، مرکز تحقیقات توانبخشی عضلانی-اسکلتی، گروه فیزیوتراپی، دانشکده علوم توانبخشی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 عضو هیات علمی، مرکز تحقیقات توانبخشی عضلانی-اسکلتی، گروه فیزیوتراپی، دانشکده علوم توانبخشی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

3 عضو هیات علمی، مرکز تحقیقات توانبخشی عضلانی-اسکلتی، گروه گفتاردرمانی، دانشکده علوم توانبخشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

چکیده

اگرچه بخش عمده ارزشیابی دانشجویان رشته­های پیراپزشکی و توانبخشی، ارزشیابی بالینی است، اما یافتن روش مناسب که مورد رضایت دانشجویان نیز باشد، همیشه چالش برانگیز بوده است. اغلب، اساتید بالینی بر اساس مشاهدات خود و به روش ذهنی ارزشیابی بالینی دانشجویان را انجام می­دهند. ارزشیابی عملکرد بالینی براساس سیاهه وارسی  و ارائه بازخورد مناسب به دانشجویان، عاملی مؤثر در دستیابی به اهداف آموزشی است. هدف  از این مطالعه، بررسی میزان رضایت مندی دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی رشته فیزیوتراپی اهواز از روش ارزشیابی عملکرد بالینی با استفاده از سیاهه وارسی مبتنی بر بازخورد بود. در این مطالعه توصیفی-مقطعی 43 دانشجوی کارشناسی رشته فیزیوتراپی (سال سوم و چهارم) که در نیم سال دوم سال تحصیلی 98-1397 مشغول به تحصیل بودند، شرکت داشتند. داده­ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه « سنجش رضایت مندی» پس از اتمام دوره کارآموزی جمع آوری شد. این پرسشنامه شامل 8 حیطه  و حداکثر نمره آن 95 بود. میانگین رضایت مندی دانشجویان فیزیوتراپی از سیاهه وارسی ارزشیابی12/20 ± 11/58 بود. میانگین نمره هر حیطه بر حسب درصدی از حداکثر نمره آن نشان داد که کمترین درصد مربوط به حیطه مناسب بودن (6/57 %) و بیشترین درصد مربوط به حیطه ارتقای مهارت­ها (45/64 %) بود و در همه حیطه­ها میانگین نمره بالاتر از 50 درصد بدست آمد. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که  استفاده از سیاهه وارسی، جهت ارزشیابی عملکرد بالینی دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی رشته فیزیوتراپی اهواز همراه با رضایت نسبی است. این شیوه در بهبود ارزشیابی بالینی و ارتقای کیفیت آن می­تواند بسیار مؤثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Satisfaction of Clinical Performance Evaluation using Checklist based on Feedback from Undergraduate Physiotherapy Students of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

نویسندگان [English]

  • Razieh Mofateh 1
  • Neda Orakifar 2
  • Negin Moradi 3
1 Faculty member, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 Faculty member, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
3 Faculty member, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Although the majority of student evaluation in paramedical and rehabilitation sciences is clinical evaluation, finding a suitable method that fulfills students’ satisfaction has always been challenging. Often, clinical professors evaluate their students subjectively and based on their observations. Evaluating clinical performance based on checklists and providing appropriate feedback to students is an effective factor in achieving educational goals. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction rate of undergraduate physiotherapy students of Ahvaz from clinical performance evaluation using checklist based on feedback. In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 43 undergraduate physiotherapy students) third and fourth year) were enrolled as the population who were studying in the second semester of the academic year 1397-98. Then, Data were collected using the Satisfaction Questionnaire at the end of the internship. The questionnaire also consisted of 8 domains with a maximum score of 95. The mean satisfaction of physiotherapy students was calculated 58.11 (20.12). The mean score of each domain in terms of percentage of its maximum score showed that the lowest percentage was related to suitability (57.6%) and the highest percentage belonged to skill development (64.45%). The mean score of all domains was above 50%.  According to the present study, results indicated that using checklists for evaluation of clinical performance of Ahvaz physiotherapy undergraduate students was mentioned along with relative satisfaction. This approach can be very effective in improving clinical evaluation and improving its quality.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Clinical Evaluation
  • Checklist
  • Satisfaction
  • Physiotherapy
  • Student
Al Kadri HM, Al-Moamary MS, van der Vleuten C 2009, Students' and teachers' perceptions of clinical assessment program: A qualitative study in a PBL curriculum, BMC research notes, Vol 2, No. 1, Pp. 263. [In Persian]
Asadilari M, Moshfeghy Z, Mohammad Alian F, et al 2018, Satisfaction of Undergraduate Midwifery Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from Clinical Evaluation using LOGBOOK, Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, Vol 11, No. 1, Pp. 22-9. [[In Persian]
Azh N 2006, Evaluation of midwifery students in labor and delivery training: comparing two methods of logbook and checklist. [[In Persian].
Bloxham S, Boyd P 2007, Developing Effective Assessment In Higher Education: A Practical Guide: McGraw-Hill Education. Open University Press.
Brady A-M 2005, Assessment of learning with multiple-choice questions. Nurse Education in Practice, Vol 5, No. 4, Pp. 238-42.
Chehrzad M, Shafipour Z, Mirzaei M, et al 2004, Moghayeseye do raveshe arzeshyabye balinye OSCE va sonati bar mizane rezayate daneshjooyane parastari. Journal of Gilan University of Medical Sciences, Vol 13, No. 50, Pp. 8-13. [[In Persian]
Delaram M, Tootoonchi M 2010, Comparing self-and teacher-assessmentin obstetric clerkshipcourse for midwifery students of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Iranian journal of medical education, Vol 9, No. 3, Pp. 231-8. [In Persian]
Hoseini BL 2012, Midwifery students' satisfaction with logbook as a clinical assessment means in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 2010. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, Vol 11, No. 8, Pp. 933-41. [[In Persian]
Kave Tabatabaei M, Bahraini Toosi M, Modaber Azizi M, et al 2002, Barrasye tahlilye azmoonhaye 4 gozineye daneshkadeye pezeshkye daneshgahe oloom pezeshkye mashhad dar nimsale dovome 1379-80. Journal of Medical Faculty of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Vol 45, No. 2, Pp. 89-95. [In Persian]
Khademi Zare H, Fakhrzad MB 2013, Integration of collaborative management and fuzzy systems for evaluating of students’ educational performance. Quarterly journal of research and planning in higher education, Vol 19, No. 3, Pp. 23-40. [In Persian]
Khoursandi M, Khosravi S 2002, Investigation of the view of nursing and midwifery students about clinical education condition in nursing and midwifery college of Arak University of Medical Science. [In Persian]
Kuhpayehzadeh J, Dargahi H, Soltani Arabshahi K 2012, Clinical assessment methods in medical sciences universities of Tehran–clinical instructors’ viewpoint. Hormozgan Medical Journal, Vol 16, No. 5, Pp. 395-402. [In Persian].
Kuhpayehzadeh J, Moghadam PH, Danesh H, Imanizadeh Z, Daryazadeh S 2013, Assessment of clinical performance and factors affecting it in medical interns by mini-CEX test at Hazarte –Rasool Akram hospital, Tehran, 2011. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 20, No.116. [In Persian].
Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger III HL 2008, Test‐enhanced learning in medical education. Medical education,  Vol 42, No. 10, Pp. 959-66.
Mansourian A, Shirazian S, Jalili M, et al 2017, Checklist development for assessing the dental students' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating. Journal of Dental Medicine, Vol 29, No. 3, Pp. 169-76. [In Persian]
Mohammadi A, Khaghanizadeh M, Ebadi A, et al 2010, Log book; a method of evaluating education and feedback strategy in nursing. [In Persian]
Mohseni R, Sandoughdar N, Bradaran H, et al 2016, Educational Environment of Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital; Viewpoints of Speech-Therapy Learners. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No. 6, Pp. 43-8. [In Persian]
Moradi N, Hosseini Beidokhti M 2017, Assessing the Satisfaction Level of Rehabilitation Trainers and Students from the Clinical Internship Assessment Checklist. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research, Vol 4, No. 4, Pp. 114-9. [In Persian]
Norton L 2004, Using assessment criteria as learning criteria: a case study in psychology. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, Vol 29, No. 6, Pp. 687-702.
Reid WA, Duvall E, Evans P 2007, Relationship between assessment results and approaches to learning and studying in year two medical students. Medical education, Vol 41, No. 8, Pp. 754-62.
Shahgheibi S, Pooladi A, BahramRezaie M, et al 2009,  Evaluation of the Effects of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) on clinical externship students’ learning level in obstetrics ward of kurdistan university of medical sciences. Journal of Medical Education, Vol 13, No. 1,2, Pp. 1128.[In Persian]
Shallaly G, Ali EA, Ahmad NO 2009, Development and Use of Checklists for Assessment of Medical Students in Clinical Examinations on Real Patients: A preliminary study. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 4, No. 1. [In Persian]
Sobhani R 2013. Provide an appropriate methodology for developing educational strategies. Master Thesis in Industrial Engineering, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Stewart K, Shelette 2003. The Relationship Strategic Planning and Growth in Small Business, a Dissertation Submitted to Nova Southeastern University.