ارائه مدلی جهت بهسازی دانشجو درسیستم آموزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی (مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی- واحد سنندج)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، تهران، ایران.

2 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، تهران، ایران

3 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، تهران، ایران.

4 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه آمار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه مدلی جهت بهسازی دانشجو در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌صورت گرفت. پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و روش اجرای این پژوهش، آمیخته است که ابتدا به‌روش کیفی و سپس کمّی انجام شده است. در بخش کیفی جامعه مورد مطالعه، صاحبنظران در زمینه بهسازی دانشجو بودند که با روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند و تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری (14نفر) انجام شد و در بخش کمّی جامعه موردنظر، دانشجویان سال آخر مقاطع کارشناسی و تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی- واحد سنندج به تعداد 1500 نفر در نیمسال اول سال تحصیلی 98-97 بود که با توجه به جدول مورگان ( 320=n نفر) و با روش نمونه­گیری، طبقه‌بندی با تخصیص متناسب انتخاب شدند. پس از انجام مصاحبه عمیق فهرستی از 5 بعد شامل آموزشی، فردی، اجتماعی، پژوهشی و ایجاد اشتغال پایدار برای خود و دیگران و 24 مؤلفه شناسایی شد. مدل مفهومی استخراج‌شده با توجه به فلسفه، اهداف، مبانی نظری، ابعاد و مؤلفه­ها، ساز وکار اجرایی، فرآیند اجرایی، نظام بازخورد و ارزیابی در سطح خطای 05/0  مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Model for Student Improvement in the Educational System of Islamic Azad University(Case Study: Islamic Azad University- Sanandaj Branch)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Pariya Porbaran 1
  • Hamideh Reshadat Jo 2
  • Kamran Mohammadkhani 3
  • Adel Fatemi 4
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Higher Education Management, Islamic Azad University, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tehran, Iran.
2 Faculty Member, Department of Higher Education Management, Islamic Azad University, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tehran, Iran.
3 Faculty Member, Higher Education Management Department, Islamic Azad University, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tehran, Iran.
4 Faculty Member, Department of Statistics, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The present research was aimed to provide a model for student’ development at Islamic Azad University. This research was an applied research in terms of purpose and its implementation method consisted of qualitative and quantitative methods (quantitative or quantitative research or mixed-method).  The statistical population of this study in quantitative and qualitative sections was different. In the qualitative section of the study, population included experts in the field of student Development (14 members were selected through purposive sampling method); whereas, in the quantitative part, population included all the final year students of undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate degrees in Islamic Azad University-Sanandaj Branch in the first semester of 2018-2019 were estimated to 1500 person. The sample size in the qualitative section was selected based on the theoretical saturation and sample size in the quantitative part was selected by Morgan table (n=320). The sampling method was random- Stratified, according to sampling method classification with appropriate allocation. After conducting an in-depth interview, a list of 5 dimensions including educational, individual, social, research, and sustainable employment goals and 24 components of the student's Development were identified for themselves and others. The extracted conceptual model was approved according to the philosophy, objectives, theoretical foundations, dimensions and components, executive mechanism, executive process, feedback system and evaluation at the error level of 0.05.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Student development
  • Educational Development
  • Individual development
  • Social development
  • Islamic Azad University
Bergom I, Et al. 2011. Promoting college student Development through collaborative learning: A case study of Hevruta. In: wiley online library. Com.
Boettcher jv 2007. Ten core principles for designing effective learning environments: in sights from brain research and pedagogical Theory. Innovate journal of online education. Vol. 3, No. 3.
Braxton john M, et al 2001. Preparation For professional self- regulation. Spring link.
Bruckner, Lillian, j. Van vlack. (2014). Proquest.
Dinther M, Dochy F, Segers M 2011. Factors affecting students, self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review. Elsevier.
Emanzadeh Bane A, et al 2014. The Effect of Education Based on New Educational Technologies on Students' Life Skills in Universities of Mazandaran Province. From: Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. Vol. 4, No. 3. [In Persian].
Fatemi A. 2015. Fitting Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL Software. Tehran: Terme Publications. First Edition. [In Persian].
Fruiht veronica  M 2015. Supportive others in the lives of college students and their relevance to hope. SAGE.
Ghorchian  N, Eftekharzade S F 2016. Providing a model for the training of professional citizens in the country's higher education system in the third millennium. Journal of Economics and Management. No. 70. [In Persian].
Holmes J, et al. 2015. Applying student Development Theory to college student's spiritual Beliefs.
Holmes J, murphy  J 2011. The Use of e-portfolios to support professional development of student nutritionists- Apilot study. Proceeding of the Nutrition society.
Ibrahim R, Et al 2010. Student development in higher education: A constructivist approach CCIS-73.
Jackson  S E, Hitt  M A 2003. The Knowledge based Approach to sustainable competitive advantage. Jossy- Bass.
Javdani H 2010. The Role of the University in the Development Process From: Higher Education Letters. Vol. 3, No. 10. [In Persian].
Jung peng P, Thungkasamit A 2014. The continuing professional Development of the Assessment through Research- based learning in Higher education of Thailand. Science Direct. Procedia.
Knefelkamp  L  2003. Student Development Theory. In jame j. forest and kevin kinser. Higher Education in the United states: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC- CLIO.
Mansouri R 2001. University and its definition. Journal of Policy Research and Approach, No. 24. [In Persian].
Navasa M, Carmen O 2014. The improvement of employability among Higher education students.: The Use of emotional intelligence as an educational strategy. Elsevier. Procedia- social and Behavioral sciences.139.
 
Niaz Azeri K, Taghvaie Yazdi M 2010. Culture in the Third Millennium. Tehran: Shaykh Publications. [In Persian].
Paladino Derrick A, et al 2011. Interactive training model: Enhancing Beginning counseling student development.
 Pargett Kelly k 2011. The effects of academic advising  on college student Development in higher education. University of Nebraska- Lincoln. Search: student development thesis.
Reid Karen M, et al 2015. College first-Year seminars: college student retention. Vol. 16, No. 1. Proquest.
Ryan  john F 2005. A Role for Financial Resources in Enhancing student learning and development. Research in higher education. Vol. 46. Springer.
Shadfar H, et al 2011. Assessment of Adaptation of Curriculum Management and Educational Planning to Students' Needs. From: Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. No. 62. [In Persian].
Student Development theory- The Basics U Calgary 2014. www.U Calgary. Ca/ses/ student Development theory.
Thieke W S, et al. (2015). A model of developmental change in freshman students. Proquest.
www. Saddle back. Edu/ student Development/ learning- out comes. (2011).
 www.saddle back.edu/ VPSS. Disabled students programs and service saddle back college.
Zhang L 2015. Thinking styles and Identity. Jstor. HONG-kong University.