طراحی مدل برای توسعه بهتر سرمایه‌های انسانی مبتنی بر نیازهای خودتعیین گری و آموزشی دانشجویان (موردمطالعه: دانشگاه و پژوهشگاه عالی دفاع ملی و تحقیقات راهبردی)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی، گروه مدیریت و توسعه منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت و پژوهش منابع انسانی، دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران.

2 عضو هیات علمی ، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خرم آباد، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر باهدف طراحی مدلی برای توسعه بهتر سرمایه­های انسانی با نیازهای خودتعیین گری و آموزشی دانشجویان انجام شد. در پژوهش کاربردی - پیمایشی حاضر، جامعه آماری پژوهش را کلیهی دانشجویان دانشگاه و پژوهشگاه عالی دفاع ملی و تحقیقات راهبردی در سال ۱۳۹۸ تشکیل می‌دادند که از ‌بین آن­ها تعداد 300 نفر  به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و با پرسشنامه‌های نیازهای خودتعیین­گری و پرسشنامه عوامل تسهیل‌کننده و بازدارنده مدیریت سرمایه­های انسانی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. نتایج تحلیل عاملی، نشان داد که نگرش نسبت توسعه، احساس برتری، وفاداری سرمایه­های انسانی، رهبری توسعه‌گرا، بازبینی و بررسی، سیاست‌گذاری، فرهنگ‌سرمایه­های انسانی، برابری سرمایه­های انسانی و فضای سرمایه­های انسانی عوامل مدیریت سرمایه­های انسانی را تشکیل می‌دهند. همچنین ارتباط مثبتی بین توانمندسازی روانشناختی و عوامل تسهیل‌کننده مدیریت سرمایه­های انسانی وجود داشت. بنابراین بر اساس یافته­های مطالعه کاملاً مشخص است که توجه به عوامل فرهنگی، سیاسی، شخصیتی و آموزشی برای ارتقای و توسعه مدیریت سرمایه های انسانی مهم و ضروری است که حتماً باید مورد توجه قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Model for an Ideal Human Resources Improvement based on Students' Self-determination and Educational Needs (Case study: University and Institute of Higher National Defense Research and Strategic Research)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abbas Chahardoli 1
  • Mahdi Yousefvand 2
1 Faculty Member, Department of Human Resource Management and Development, Faculty of Human Resource Management and Research, National Defense University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Faculty Member, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to design a model for better development of human resources considering self-determination and educational needs of students. In the present applied-survey study, the statistical population of the study consisted of all university students and the National Research Institute of National Defense and Strategic Research in 2009 that 300 samples were selected by available sampling method; and self-determination needs questionnaires, Gary and the Questionnaire of Factors Facilitating and Preventing Human Resource Management were distuributed. The results of factor analysis showed that human resource management factors constituted the attitude to development ratio, feeling of superiority, loyalty of human resources, developmental leadership, supervision and follow-up, policy, human resources culture, human resource justice and human resources. There was also a positive relationship between psychological empowerment and human resource management facilitators. Therefore, based on the present research’ findings, it is completely clear that paying attention to cultural, political, personality and educational factors, which must be considered, were identified important and necessary for the promotion and development of human resource management.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • pattern
  • human resources
  • Self-Determination Needs
  • Students
Afjeh SAA & RezaeiAbianeh N 2013, The Relationship between Organizational Learning and Employee Preparedness for Change in Insurance Companies; Quarterly Journal of Management Improvement Studies, Vol.70, No.31, Pp.231-224[In Persian].
Baild J 2006, The Intent Leave: An Investigation of Empowerment Mechanism, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment Among Technical College Employees. Unpublished dissertation, Cappella University. Vol.15, No.31, Pp.23-38.
Barabanshchikova VV, Meshkova PR & Surov DN 2014, Comparison of Stress Level among School Teachers in the Period of Organizational Changes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.146, No.15, Pp.375-380.
Bazasbardi A & Moeinfard MR 2013, The Relationship of Empowerment with Preparedness for Change in Personnel in Physical Education Faculties of Tehran State Universities, Research in University Sports, Vol.3, No.14, Pp.49-31[In Persian].
Dawson P 2003, Undrestanding organizational change; The contemporary experience of people at work. London: Sage publication. Vol.13, No.10, Pp.175-200.
Greasley K, Bryman A, Dainty A & etal King 2005, Employee Participation of Empowerment. Employee Relation, Vol.27, No.4, Pp.354-368.
Harigopal K 2006, Management of organizational change: leveraging transformation. 2nd ed. Response books. Vol.4, No.22, Pp.562-574.
Harsy Paul, Blanchard K 2011,  Organizational Behavior Management, translated by Dr. Ali Eshghband, Amirkabir Publications.
Jiang Z, Hu X & Wang Z 2018, Career adaptability and plateaus: The moderating effects of tenure and job self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.104, No.55, Pp59-71.
Kameli MJ, Bakhtiariasl T, Lotfiarbatan A etal 2013, Investigating Employees' Behavioral Patterns Against Change, Journal of Management Studies (Improvement and Transformation), 23 (70) 23, 103-134[In Persian].
Keshavarz L, Sarkhosh S 2013, Relationship between job self-efficacy of managers and organizational commitment of employees with customer satisfaction of Kerman province youth and youth office. Applied Research in Sport Management, Vol.1, No.8, Pp.1-12[In Persian].
Kondratuk F, Tammy B, Peter A etal 2004, Linking career mobility with corporate loyalty: How does job change relate to organizational commitment? Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.6, No.2, Pp.332-349.
Lamm E & Gordon JR 2010, Empowerment, Predisposition to Resist Change, and Support for Organizational Change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational, Vol.17, No.20, Pp.426-437.
Mohammadzadeh A 2012, Development Management (Organizational Transformation as Strategy), Tehran: Position.
Pajic S, Ulceluse M, Kismihók G etal 2018, Antecedents of job search self-efficacy of Syrian refugees in Greece and the Netherlands. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.105, No.7, Pp.159-172.
Robbins SP 2008, Organization behavior; concepts, theories and applications. 9thed. New Jersey: Prentice – Hall. Vol.142, No.15, Pp. 270-95.
Sang P 2011, The fifth commandment - the creation of the learning organization. Translation: Perfect Hedayat and Hafiz Roshan, Muhammad. fourth edition. Tehran. Industrial Management Organization. Vol.1, No.9, Pp.145-168. [In Persian]
Sasiadek S 2006, Individual Influence Factors That Impact Employee Empowerment: A Multi Case Study. Unpublished dissertation, Capella University.
 
Sengupta N, Mousumi S & Sengupta R 2006, Managing change in organizations. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private limited. Vol.13, No.71, Pp.455-462.
SharmaRadha R 2007, Change management: concepts and applications.The Mc Graw-Hill Companies.
Shyni V, Kumari K & Simon G 2005, Change management vis-vis human resource management. India: discovery publishing house. Vol.13, No.8, Pp.369-378.
SpreitzerGretchen M 1995, “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement and Validation”; The Academy of Management Journal, Vol.38, No.14, Pp.178-189.
Teymournejad K, Asfestani R 2010, Any Organizational Learning on the Psychological Capacity of Normal Employees of the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Finance. Vol.3, No.14, Pp.88-93[In Persian].
Vatankhah A, Zohoorianadali I 2015, Investigating the Relationship between Employees' Intellectual Preference Patterns and Their Readiness for Organizational Change, Human Resource Management Research, Vol.4, No.8, Pp.1-26[In Persian].