ارائه مدلی برای تجاری سازی تحقیقات انجام شده در حوزه علوم تربیتی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران.

2 عضو هیئت علمی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران.

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر این است با ارائه مدل، تجاری­سازی تحقیقات علوم تربیتی را ممکن سازد. نوع تحقیق حاضر با رویکرد آمیخته است؛ روش نمونه­گیری با توجه به روش تحقیق مورد نظر از روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند است. برای این منظور در بخش کیفی بعد از مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته از 16 نفر از خبرگان اطلاعات مصاحبه جمع­آوری و کدگذاری شده و تحلیل همزمان روی آنها صورت پذیرفت. در بخش کمّی نیز، از میان دانشجویان و شاغلین آموزشی و اقتصادی به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب و پرسشنامه بین آنها پخش شد. حجم نمونه آماری برای بخش کمّی تحقیق بر اساس جدول مورگان 152 نفر بود که از میان 260 نفر به صورت نمونه­گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع­آوری اطلاعات در بخش کیفی مصاحبه عمیق با خبرگان و در بخش کمّی؛ پرسشنامه­ای 46 سوالی بود. جهت پردازش و تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار لیزرل استفاده شد. برای تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و ارائه مدل تحقیق از تکنیک مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) با نرم‌افزار LISREL استفاده گردید. با توجه به مقدار ضریب متغیرها، اولویت­بندی عوامل مؤثر بر تجاری­سازی تحقیقات انجام شده در حوزه علوم تربیتی، بالاترین اولویت مربوط به مؤلفه راهکارهای ساختاری با ضریب تاثیر 95/0 می­باشد و راهکارهای قوانین، مدیریتی و محیطی با ضریب تأثیر به ترتیب 9/0، 86/0 و 58/0 در اولویت­های بعدی قرار دارند. بنابراین می توان نتیجه گرفت که راهکارهای قوانین یکی از عوامل مؤثر بر تجاری سازی تحقیقات انجام شده در حوزه علوم تربیتی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Commercialization Model of Research in the Field of Educational Sciences

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Lame 1
  • Esmaeil Kazempour 2
1 Graduated in Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran.
2 Faculty Member, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The present study aimed to prepare a model to enable commercialization of educational science research. The study was an applied research with a mixed approach and the sampling method was also purposive sampling according to the research method. For this reason, after the semi-structured interview with 16 expert’s interviewees, data were collected, coded and analyzed simultaneously. In the quantitative part, the questionnaire was distributed among educational and economical students and practitioners; according to Morgan table, statistical sampole was 152 out of which 260 participants were selected by simple random sampling. The data collection tool was in-depth interviews with experts and 46 questionnaires in qualitative and in quantitative sections, respectively. In addition, LISREL software was used for data analysis and also structural equation modeling (SEM) technique with LISREL software was used for confirmatory factor analysis and presenting the research model. According to the coefficient of variables and prioritizing the factors influenced the commercialization of research in the field of educationit indicated the highest priority was related to the component of structural strategies with an impact factor of 0.95 and the law, management and environmental guidelines with an impact factor 0.9, 0.86 and 0.58, priorities, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the rules of law were one of the influencing factors on the commercialization of research in the field of educational sciences.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Commercialization
  • Research
  • Educational Sciences
Abbasi Esfanjani H 2006. A Framework for Supporting Technical Knowledge Management », Tadbir Journal,  Vol. 17, No. 178, Pp. 74-79. [In Persian].
Abbasi Esfanjani, Hossein; Forouzandeh Dehkordi, Lotfollah; 2016. Identification and Explanation of Determinants in Commercialization of Academic Research Using the Triple Pattern Model Journal of Science and Technology Policy Sixth Year, Number 2
Alaghband A 2010. Educational Administration Preparations (SixthEdition) Ravan Publications. [In Persian].
Amadi-Echendu, J E, Rasetlola R T 2011. Technology commercialization factors, frameworks and models. Technology Management Conference, 27
Barani E, Keshtgar A 2019. Investigating Factors Affecting Commercialization Development in Knowledge Base Companies, National Conference on Economics, Development Management and Entrepreneurship with Iranian Commodity Support approach, Zahedan, Sistan & Baluchestan Industrial Management Agency. [In Persian].
Bontoux T 2010. “Getting Technologies Such as Nanotechnology out of the Universities”, http://www.azonano.com/details. asp?ArticleId-2548. Accessed in: 2011 Pp. 03-10.
Devrim G 2004. Investigation of University Industry Technology Transfer Cases: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach, Division ofInnovation-LTH Lund University
Downie J 2006. The Power of Money: Commercialisation of Research Conducted in Public Institutions, Journal of Otago Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, Pp. 305-324.
Etzkowitz H 2003. “Research Groups as “Quasi-firms’: The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University”, Research Policy, vol. 32, Pp.109–121.
Fakoor B, Haji Hosseini H 2008. "Academic Entrepreneurship and Commercialization of Research Results in Iranian Universities (Case Study of 7 Important Universities of Iran)" Journal of Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 1, Pp. 70-59. [In Persian].
Fakur B 2005. Commercialization of Research Result ; Journal of Rahyaft, No. 34, Pp. 1-9. [in Persian].
Forouzandeh D L, Sarlak M M, Pourezzat A A, Et all.  2012. “A Comprehensive Conceptual Framework for the E-Government Realization”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 6, No. 8,Pp. 50-64. [In Persian].
Howells J, McKinlay C 1999. Commercialization of University Research in Europe.
Jahed H A, Arasteh H R 2013. External Organizational Factors Influencing the Marketing of Research Results, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 67,  Pp. 68-45. [In Persian].
Kazemi M, Safari Z, Mohammadi L 2019. The Importance of Knowledge Commercialization in the Entrepreneurship Development Process at the University, First International Conference on Modern Research in Psychology, Counseling and Behavioral Sciences, Tehran, Permanent Secretariat of the Conference. [In Persian].
Khayat Moghaddam S, Rastegar N 2013. Identification of Facilitators of Knowledge Commercialization in the Field of Humanities, Journal of Industry and University. Vol. 7, No. 23,24, Pp. 345. [In Persian].
Klofsten M, Jones-Evans D, 2000. “Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe - The case of Sweden and Ireland”; Small Business Economics; Vol. 14, Pp. 299-309.
kutinalahti P 2005. University approaching market: intertwining cientific and entrepreneurial goal, VTT: No. 589. Pp, 1-170.
Llano j  A 2006. “The university environment and academic entrepreneurship: a behavioral model for measuring environment success”; Howe School of Technology Management.
Magnus K 2004. “Commercialization of Research Results in the United States”, ITPS, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies, P.14-15,Accessed in www.itps. se
Mir A, Bagheri M, Hashemi A 2018. Prioritizing Factors Affecting Knowledge Commercialization with Knowledge Management Approach, 4th National Conference on Community Empowerment in Humanities and Management Studies, Tehran, Center for Social and Cultural Skills Empowerment. [In Persian].
Mirzaei Ahranjani H, Amiri M 2002. “Developing a Three Dimensional Model for Analysis of Philosophical Bases and Fundamental Sub Structures of Management Theories”, Iran. Journal of Management Knowledge, Pp.3-21. [In Persian].
Mohammad Salehi M, Rudi M, Mohammad Salehi M 2018. Factors Affecting Knowledge Commercialization in Universities Case Study: Allameh Tabatabai University, First Conference on Growth, Development and Human Health, Tehran, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian].
Mohammadpour B,  Rahimian H, Abbaspour A, Et all 2014. Recognizing the Challenges of Commercialization of Educational Management Research with Background Theory, Journal of New Approaches to Educational Management. Vol. 3, No. 11, Pp. 1-26. [In Persian].
Nagy J, Robb A 2008. Can universities be good corporate citizens? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Critical Perspectives on Accounting No. 19, Pp. 1414–1430.
Nowotny H 2006. Real Science is Excellent- how to Interpret Post- Academic Science, Mode 2 and ERC ; Journal of Science Communication, Vol. 5, No. 4, Pp. 1-4
Paya A 2008. Critical considerations about the two concept of religious science and indigenous knowledge, the Second Congress of Human Sciences, Tehran, Institute of Humanities [In Persian].
Thanh Huyen T T 2009. “A Study of the Key Success Factors for New Technology Commercialization”, Master’s thesis, National Cheng KungUniversity, Available at: http://etds. lib. ncku. edu. tw...
Wright M, Clarysse B, Mustar P Et all 2007. “Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe”; Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton; Pp. 172-3.